Apple splits from Intel Key lessons for innovators

    Over the past decade, Intel processors have been the driving force behind computing power in Apple products. Meanwhile, the relationship between the two tech giants seemed tight. Nothing seemed to separate the two until Apple officially announced it. We have announced to the world that we are ending our partnership with Intel.

Apple splits from Intel Key lessons for innovators

    What's wrong? Many important lessons can be learned from this divorced love story. What's the story and key lesson? Let's take a look at the following articles: In November 2020, Apple officially announced that it would replace the Intel processor, formerly the heart of computing power in all Apple devices, with an Apple-made processor called Apple Silicon. The simple reaction was a combination of anger that prompted Apple to leave Intel.

    Itel's predictions and its inability to keep up with its ever-increasing acceleration, but the story behind it is far more interesting than we'll study, and there are many lessons to be learned. Let's start from the beginning, in 2005, when this article was just born, we discovered that desktop computers couldn't use the j-five processor, the flagship product for use in laptops. This is why in 2005 Apple asked Intel to provide processors for use in laptops. This was the beginning of a great relationship with Apple. with Intel.

    Shortly thereafter, Apple switched to Intel processors across its entire product line, not just laptops. My mother also switched to her MacBook Powerbook, so the MacBook Pro Power Max became the Max Pro at the time. Apple hoped to create the mobile phone products we know today when the iPhone and Intel had their first chance to make a processor for it, but according to Intel's CEO, unfortunately Intel declined the offer.

    Intel doesn't believe Opel will be able to sell iPhones in high volume, so production costs will be higher without high volume sales...so it doesn't hurt. According to Intel, Apple ended up designing its own processor and commissioning Samsung to manufacture it. We now know what happened. Yes, it's true that Intel's prediction is wrong. Total demand for iPhones is more than 100 times what Intel and others first predicted at the time. And Intel got a very good happy ending Hello, obviously the story doesn't get any more interesting Some sources say Apple can't keep up with the accelerating computing needs for Apple's products He started complaining about it several times. keep automatically upgrades processors incrementally, but Apple wants to progress exponentially, and Intel has said to Apple that it will produce higher-performance processors at an agreed-upon time for the time being. unable to fulfill its promise.

    In a moment that heralded the end of Apple and Intel's collaboration, Swap Fitno's former Intel principal engineer said Lex had many problems, from large to small, and Apple was the most correct customer to report problems. I was. apple can't run a lot of boxes out of processor work and they're obviously not good for the internet.This is why the epl folks who have long wanted to let go so they can make their own processors , there is actually a reason to do it by guaranteeing low quality, a tipping point that ultimately strengthens the decision to use the processor. 2018 reported that Apple was planning to leave Intel to produce its own processors. Apple is known for its desire to control every part of its devices. Even when Apple bought the device, Intel's modem business was worth $1 billion in 2019.

    It's actually not surprising that Apple moved from Intel to its own processors to develop phage technology for all devices, but it's an annual process that should be predictable in its direction. Here's why Intel e Apple doesn't look like Bergek King if there's any indication of abandoning them and making their own processors.

    Interesting question. Dominating the world's microprocessor market, and in reality, until then, no company on the planet could make a better microprocessor than Intel Hi, but Apple released its homegrown Apple Silicon M1 processor. Now ? Can it compete with Intel processors or milk far underperformed expectations and how did the market react? turned out to be Observers and practitioners also seem to agree that Apple has successfully beaten Intel on this point.

    Predict the number of iPhones sold so that they are reluctant to make processors for iPhones. So what can we learn from the history of Apple and Intel? At least the first three numbers in the table reflect enough past phenomena to shape the future. Often you have to rely on your intuition. Intel's CEO regretted not accepting Apple's offer to build a processor for the iPhone at this Volt level.Die Zeit said my intuition was that I should have accepted Apple's offer, I should have followed my intuition. It was that moment.

    Just because you're currently the best in your field doesn't mean there aren't others who are sure to be ready for this exponential age. If so, small improvements mean nothing. They are looking at it as an opportunity for you to grow rapidly. Don't be too transactional. Think of it as a long term investment. The best customers are those who can force you to keep jumping and burning to play at a higher level. What's the most ironic thing about this story? Intel founder Andy Grove said his Very famous for its message: Success breeds complacency, complacency breeds failure.Please comment on likes and benefits, thank you

Location:

Berbagi :